How to Build a Research Agenda from an Institutional Priority
A practical way to turn a broad strategic concern into research questions, projects and decisions.
GRS Editorial · GPGRead guideGRS editorial · Knowledge transfer
Making Research Useful beyond Publication
Design knowledge transfer around a defined audience, decision and feedback loop.
Knowledge transfer
A practical starting point.
Design knowledge transfer around a defined audience, decision and feedback loop. This guide offers a starting method for teams developing research and institutional decisions. Adapt it to the question, context and relevant scientific, ethics and data requirements.
Step 01
Identify the user
A practitioner, senior leader and policy analyst may need different forms of the same findings. Ask what decision or action the research should inform and what constraints the intended users face. Start that conversation before the report is written.
Step 02
Choose a usable format
A full methods report supports scrutiny; a brief highlights choices; a workshop helps teams interpret implications. Preserve links to the original evidence so simplification does not erase caveats. Translation and accessibility may matter as much as document length.
Step 03
Support interpretation
Discuss applicability, costs, equity and implementation conditions with users. Avoid assuming that awareness automatically changes practice. A pilot or practical guide can help test whether the recommendation works in the local setting.
Step 04
Track uptake honestly
Measure reach, discussion, decisions and changes in practice separately. Gather feedback on what was unclear or unusable. Citation counts or event attendance alone do not establish impact. Use the findings to revise both the output and the next research question.
Illustrative application
What this could look like.
A leadership study might find that clearer delegation improves response times in several cases. An executive brief can describe the conditions and caveats; a workshop can help managers test a delegation schedule locally. Follow up to learn whether decisions changed and whether staff found the guidance workable, rather than using attendance as the only measure.
Put it into practice
A short working checklist.
- Write the precise decision or research question this work should support.
- Record the sources, methods, stakeholders and permissions needed before proceeding.
- Agree who reviews the output and how limitations will be communicated.
- Set a date to revisit the decision when evidence or conditions change.
GRS Group editorial guide · Published 24 September 2026 · Informational guidance, not an empirical study or formal professional advice.
Related research
Continue with the centre and knowledge model.
Global Leadership Research Center Research & Knowledge All guidesFurther reading